Federal Court Rejects Predator Killing Scheme in Idaho
A U.S. Department of Agriculture plan that would kill badgers, foxes, coyotes,
and ravens across hundreds of square miles of public lands in southern Idaho
was rejected today in federal District Court in Boise, Idaho.
In his ruling, U.S. District Court Judge B. Lynn Winmill handed a major
victory to the Committee for the High Desert, Western Watersheds Project,
Idaho Conservation League and Defenders of Wildlife in finding that Wildlife
Services' predator killing plan lacked adequate environmental analysis.
Winmill called the Wildlife Services analysis "troublesome."
"For the third year in a row, we have stopped the killing of alleged sage
grouse predators throughout Idaho," said Todd Tucci, attorney for Advocates
for the West, representing the conservation groups. "Hopefully, this decision
will put an end to the nonsense that predators are depressing sage grouse
populations. Every objective biologist knows that degraded habitat, and not
predators, is causing sage grouse populations to plummet."
The predator control plan is a joint scheme between Wildlife Services of the
USDA (formerly Animal Damage Control) and the Idaho Department of Fish and
Game.
In his ruling, Winmill noted: "The [environmental assessment] contains an
unusual twist: it proposes to kill sage grouse predators in specific locations
but does not study those locations."
"The court has confirmed that Wildlife Services' radical approach is totally
out of line," said Jon Marvel, executive director of WWP. "If the agency
continues to flout the environmental laws of this country in its obsession to
kill wildlife, we will track every step in its management of public lands."
In April 2002, the four conservation groups sued the USDA over its plan to
kill foxes, badgers, coyotes, ravens and other wildlife species in southern
Idaho. The groups sought a restraining order to prevent Wildlife Services from
eliminating species believed to prey on sage grouse across large tracts of
southern Idaho.
In response to the lawsuit, the USDA agreed to postpone its program until at
least 2003.
"It is long past time for Wildlife Services to have satiated its appetite for
the indiscriminate killing of predators," said Katie Fite, conservation
director of CHD.
"Trying to restore declining sage grouse populations by killing thousands of
foxes, badgers and coyotes and ravens misses the point," said Justin Hayes of
ICL. "Sage grouse are in decline because of decades of poor land management.
Hopefully this will be the last time that we see the federal government
propose to kill wildlife on public lands via cyanide based poisons and aerial
gunning."
Winmill's ruling marks the third consecutive year that the USDA's wildlife
killing plan has been stopped through legal challenges. The Bureau of Land
Management and U.S. Forest Service, which participated in the environmental
assessments of the program, are co-defendants in the lawsuit.
"The court saw right through Wildlife Services' attempts to justify its
inadequate environmental analysis," said Mike Leahy, natural resources counsel
for Defenders of Wildlife. "Wiping out predators under the guise of studying
sage grouse is a bad idea to begin with."
"Perhaps Wildlife Services will learn from its past failures and become an
agency that complies with, rather than violates repeatedly, our country's most
important environmental laws," said Tucci.
The case name is Committee for Idaho's High Desert, Western Watersheds
Project, Idaho Conservation League, and Defenders of Wildlife v. Mark Collinge
et al., Case No. CV. 02-0172-S-BLW.